Home

Visas

Contributions

E-mail


Archives

Minister's Speeches


Scholarships


China Affairs

CARICOM Affairs

 Commonwealth
Affairs

 

The Ministry The Minister Contact & Overseas Missions Diplomatic 
Relations
International 
Agreements

 

STATEMENT BY THE MINISTER OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS ON THE ISSUANCE OF VISAS

 November  21, 2005

The Free National Movement yesterday Sunday 20th November issued a statement with regard to the issuance of visas by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Nassau.  In it, the party made allegations about the Minister of Foreign Affairs with regard to the issuance of visas.  

Our initial analysis reveals that these are again rehashes of allegations made before by that party.  On each occasion that the FNM has made the allegations, the Ministry has invited the Free National Movement to make a formal complaint outlining any wrong doing which they allege has occurred.  They have been unable to do so.  On three occasions most recently in the Minister's address at his party's national convention, the Free National Movement was invited to report any allegations to the police.  They have again failed to do so.  Instead, they now make political charges by the use of documents which clearly do not disclose the whole facts of the matters.  

The documents neither disclose a breach of security nor that a decision was made which was outside the discretion of the officers who made the decisions.

One document purports to support their case that the Prime Minister, the Minister and a Senator are involved in the political issuance of visas.  The document proves no such thing.  What the document shows is that a complaint was made about visa issuance.  This is one of several complaints which the Minister, his office assistants or aides receive about visas on a daily basis.  They are all routinely referred to the Permanent Secretary for investigation.  The case in the document produced by the FNM was handled no differently.  The Minister had no other role in the matter. 

With regard to any allegations about the issuance of visas as they relate to persons allegedly sponsored by Sidney Stubbs, a Member of Parliament; the Free National Movement must again point to the evidence of some wrongdoing on the part of the Minister or any public officials.  They are unable to do so.  The information which they provide is only part of the story.  

The rules on the granting visas are even tougher than they were under the Free National Movement in that brokers or middle men are restricted from applying for visas. 

The Free National Movement surely does not expect the public to believe that the Minister involves himself in the day to day granting of visas.  He does not.  The system does not work that way.  It is the Permanent Secretary who conducts the day to day business of the Ministry and there is no interference on visa decisions by the Minister of Foreign Affairs.   

One must be careful, however to note that even if the Minister gives an instruction to deny, grant, or review a visa application, that is not political interference.  In law, the last level of appeal is to the Minister.  During his time in office, the Minister does not ever recall exercising such a power. 

Contrary to the FNM’s assertion, the Minister has never sought to cast the political responsibility for the Ministry on public servants, but the decision of the Minister to isolate himself from day to day visa decisions is appropriate, so to avoid precisely the instant circumstances where ill founded gossip, based on stolen documents, that tell half the story, can find their way into the public domain through overly ambitious, half baked and irresponsible politicians. 

One must remember that the country today is more dynamic than during the FNM’s time in office.  The demands therefore for legitimate travel and access to The Bahamas have increased.  It is unfortunate that by use of two nationalities they seek to use prejudice as a means of confusing the issue.  Once the traveler has the resources to sustain himself in The Bahamas and is able to assure the consular officer that he will return home and there is no adverse national security report, there is no reason why he should not be granted a visa.  The FNM has to say whether or not the persons they allege received visas are still within The Bahamas.  The Ministry’s requirements are that visa recipients return home. 

The Ministry repeats what the Minister said in his Convention address that a management audit is now being conducted by the Public Service Commission into the conduct of the affairs of the division.  All of the previous allegations made by the Free National Movement with regard to the division have been referred to the Commission and the Free National Movement is free to offer any further information which they have that would assist in that investigation.   

There is certainly nothing which they now reveal to suggest improper conduct on the part of the Minister.  In fact, in referring the matter to the Permanent Secretary, that establishes accountable and transparent action on the part of the Minister.  Once the Permanent Secretary receives it, the matter is beyond the Minister. 

However, since the Free National Movement have steadfastly refused to or have declined to provide their information to the police, the Minister has instructed that forthwith the police be asked to investigate the instant allegations made by the Free National Movement.  The investigation ought to include but need not be limited to the following: 

·        Any allegations made by the Free National Movement and any evidence in its possession; 

·        An investigation into how documents that appear to have been stolen from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs got into the possession of Carl Bethel, a Senator designate for the Free National Movement. 

The results of any investigation will be shared with the public.

--  end  --

21st November, 2005

Ministry of Foreign Affairs